U.S. MORAL EMBARGO ON EXPORTS TO JAPAN

Washington, D.C. · July 2, 1940

America responded to Japan’s invasion of China in 1937 and to the many news reports of indis­crimi­nate bombing of Chinese civil­ian tar­gets by im­posing trade restric­tions on exports to Japan. Ini­tially a procla­ma­tion by Presi­dent Franklin D. Roose­velt on June 26, 1940, it morphed into an expres­sion of national moral out­rage when the U.S. Con­gress passed the Export Con­trol Act on this date in 1940. The act gave the presi­dent power to halt or cur­tail the export of mate­rials vital to U.S. defense and, more notably, limit the unlicensed export of certain materials to Japan.

Invoking the act on July 5, 1940, Roose­velt sus­pended the sale of air­craft parts (air­craft sales were al­ready halted), chemi­cals, and stra­tegic mine­rals to Japan—an act that raised the level of ten­sion between the two nations. Toward the end of the month the govern­ment halted ship­ments of high-octane avia­tion fuel, lubri­cant, and pre­mium scrap metals such as iron and steel. Lacking natural resources, Japan was sorely pressed to con­tinue its aggres­sion against China (for in­stance, Japan was almost totally depend­ent on U.S. oil), much less expand its eco­nomic and mili­tary orbit around West­ern colo­nial holdings in its South­east Asia back­yard. Washing­ton ratcheted up its attempts to restrain Japa­nese expan­sionist poli­cies by embar­going machine tools and all iron and steel ship­ments. That prompted Japan’s ambas­sador to the U.S. on Octo­ber 8, 1940, to pro­test the expanding export ban as “an unfriendly act.” The State Depart­ment’s response was to advise American citizens to leave the Far East.

Japan’s frus­tra­tion over the mili­tary stale­mate in China and the cas­cading em­bar­goes—the British and the Dutch followed suit in banning trade between their South­east Asian colonies and Japan—pushed Tokyo in the oppo­site direc­tion that West­ern leaders wanted Japan to take. The only way for­ward and build momen­tum, as Japa­nese leaders saw it, was for their mili­tary to seize con­trol of the resources of British Malaya and the Dutch East Indies (present-day Malaysia and Indo­nesia, respectively). It was a gamble taken in steps, first by moving soldiers and naval personnel into French Indo­china (today’s Vietnam)—prompting West­ern nations to freeze Japa­nese assets in their coun­tries—then opening up sham nego­ti­a­tions in Washing­ton, D.C., in Novem­ber and early Decem­ber 1941 after Army general Hideki Tōjō, Japan’s hard­line Minister of War, became prime minis­ter on Octo­ber 17, 1941. Mean­while, on Decem­ber 1, 1941, Emperor Hiro­hito gave his military permission to attack Western interests on December 7 and 8.

Japan and the U.S. on the Threshold of War

Planned Japanese defense in Asia Pacific, November 1941

Above: Map showing Japanese plans for expanding into South­east Asia and Japa­nese troop dis­po­si­tions for defending their con­quests and the Home Islands, November 1941.

Nomura and Kurusu at White House, November 27, 1941Nomura (from left), Hull, Kurusu, Washington, November 17, 1941

Left: Japanese Ambassador Adm. Kichisaburō Nomura and Special En­voy Saburō Kurusu (tipping hat) after speaking with Secre­tary of State Cor­dell Hull and Presi­dent Roose­velt at the White House, Novem­ber 27, 1941. Through much of the year, Nomura and Hull dis­cussed ways to resolve differ­ences over Japan’s terri­torial am­bi­tions in China and French Indo­china and the U.S. oil em­bargo. On Novem­ber 15, 1941, Nomura was joined by former ambas­sador to Nazi Germany Kurusu. Kurusu presented FDR and Hull Japa­nese Prime Minis­ter Hideki Tōjō’s pro­po­sal that the U.S. cease pro­viding mili­tary sup­port to China and resume trade rela­tions that had been frozen in December 1939.

Right: Nomura and Kurusu with Hull (middle), Novem­ber 17, 1941. The two diplo­mats would visit Hull again on Sun­day afternoon (Washing­ton time), Decem­ber 7, 1941. The Secretary of State had just learned of the sur­prise Japa­nese attack on Pearl Harbor, but his visitors had not yet read Tokyo’s coded mes­sage informing them of the attack because their em­bassy’s techni­cal sup­port staff was off duty that day. Hull, after glancing over Nomura and Kurusu’s note explaining Japan’s rationale for breaking off nego­ti­a­tions with Wash­ing­ton, told the two envoys, “In all my fifty years of public ser­vice I have never seen such a docu­ment that was more crowded with infa­mous false­hood and dis­tor­tion.” As the rattled en­voys bowed them­selves out of Hull’s office, the Sec­re­tary of State was heard to mutter at the closing door, “Scoundrels and piss-ants.”

Several Contemporary Newsreels Document Japanese Military Aggression on Chinese Mainland